Jefferson Banner - Opinion
John Foust - JDC

 

From: "Curt Witynski" <witynski@lwm-info.org>
To: "John Foust" <jfoust@threedee.com>
Subject: Re: Jefferson Commerce and Industry Association
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 15:49:29 -0500
Organization: League of Wisconsin Municipalities

Mr. Foust: I received your e-mail message and fax on the same issue. I was
out of the office this week and didn't get back until Tursday. Hence, the
delay in responding to you. I recall the phone conversation with Dave
Schornack on this issue and remember thinking that there isn't any case or
statutory law directly addressing such a situation. I believe Dave's memo
accurately reflects my comments.

Curt
----- Original Message -----
From: John Foust <jfoust@threedee.com>
To: <witynski@lwm-info.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 11:12 AM
Subject: Jefferson Commerce and Industry Association


>
> Dear Attorney Witynski,
>
> For several months, I have been involved with opening the Jefferson, WI,
> Commerce and Industry Association (CIA) and Jefferson Development
> Corporation (JDC).
>
> I was successful in getting an opinion from the Jefferson County District
> Attorney, confirming that the JDC was subject to open meetings law and
> open records law.
>
> Shortly before the D.A.'s opinion was released, the CIA held a private
> meeting and without a vote confirmed they were subject to open meetings
> and open records law.
>
> Recently Jefferson City Administrator David Schornack has claimed that
> because the CIA opened itself voluntarily, it could pick and choose which
> records it released. He spoke with you about this.
>
> >From my perspective, the CIA was created by action of the City Council
> in 1994, is 100% funded by the City, staffed by the City, has three of
> seven Board members from City positions, housed without rent in a City
> building, and should have always been subject to open meetings and
> open records law.
>
> Is the memo below an accurate recounting of your conversation with
> Schornack? If so, can you give me a more detailed explanation as
> to where the statutes or Attorney General opinions describe the
> situation where the CIA can "pick and choose" which records it releases?
>
> - John Foust
> (920) 674-5200
>
> --------
>
> To: Commerce and Industry Association
> From: Dave Schornack
> Subject: Discussion with Curt Witynski from the League of Wisconsin
> Municipalities
> Date: September 7, 1999
>
> At the last CIA meeting it was requested of myself to contact Curt
Witynski
> of the League of Wisconsin Municipalities concerning the question:
>
> "When an organization which was private goes public are there any records
> from when the organization was private that are now open records?"
>
> I discussed this with Curt and Curt's opinion is that it was the CIA that
> was choosing to go public and records that were made while the CIA was
> handling itself as a private organization would not be open. Curt went
> on to say, however, that records that were made when the CIA was private
> could be made public by the CIA on a case by case basis.
>
> --------
>